See How it Works:
Click on our instructional Video to see how easy it is to teach and study with Flashcards and Quizzes. Add a Video, Add some Pictures, or make it plain text, it has never been easier than this! Make your TRUE/FALSE, Multiple Choice, or Flashcard. Make, Share & Study with Yappr.com!
Show me How, Yappr by Category
Video Quizzes (623) Picture FlashCards (85) Picture Quizzes (228) Text FlashCards (4875) Text Quizzes (4635) True/False Quizzes (88) Reading Comprehension Surveys Product MarketingStandardized Tests
SAT PREP. (1)Advanced Placement (225)College Admissions (91)Drivers Tests (37)See all »
Languages & Vocabulary
Asian and Pacific (108)Chinese (65)English and European (299)Indian (94)See all »
abd angry aseguramiento change climate comps EXAM GMAT GRE GRE Math GRE Vocab GRE Words informacion inseguridad learn LSAT nce/ NCLEX seguridad smile TECHNOLOGY tired USMLE
Quizzes with illustrations
Flashcards
Q: Anomaly
A: (n) The condition of being abnormal: aberrance, aberrancy, aberration, abnormality, deviance, deviancy, deviation, irregularity, preternaturalness, unnaturalness
Q: Assuage
A: (v) To make less severe or more bearable: allay, alleviate, comfort, ease, lessen, lighten, mitigate, palliate, relieve
Q: Enigma
A: (n) Anything that arouses curiosity or perplexes because it is unexplained, inexplicable, or secret: conundrum, mystery, perplexity, puzzle, puzzler, riddle
52 Most Common GRE Words (Top 12)
1/4/2011
Q: abase
A: lower; degrade; humiliate; make humble; make (oneself) lose self-respect
Q: abash
A: embarrass
Q: abate
A: subside or moderate
Barrons GRE Wordlist 4,759 words
Q: abate
A: to decrease; reduce
Q: abdicate
A: to give up a position, right, or power
Q: aberrant
A: deviating from what is normal
Barron's essential words for the GRE (set 1 of 8)
3/9/2011
Q: abate
A: subside or moderate
Q: aberrant
A: abnormal or deviant
Q: abeyance
A: suspended action
GRE High Frequency Words
1/4/2011
Quizzes
Q: because
A: Premise
Q: since
A: Conclusion
Q: for
A: Conclusion
Premise & Conclusion Indicators for LSAT
1/5/2011
Q: Chinh: TV producers should not pay attention to the preferences of the viewing public when making creative decisions. Great painters do not consider what the museum-going public wants to see. Lana: But TV is expressly for the viewing public. So a producer is more like a CEO than like an artist. Just as a company would be foolhardy not to consider consumers' tastes when developing products, the TV producer must consider viewers' preferences. According to Lana, Chinh's argument is flawed in that it a) is circular b) relies on a sample of consumers that is unrepresentative of consumers in general c) infers from the effect produced by an action that the action is intended to produce that effect d) fails to consider the possibility that painters may in fact try to please the museum-going public e) offers a faulty analogy
A: E Explanation Fund-raiser's conclusion: Most charities could probably increase the amount of money they raise through donations by giving donors the right to vote on its policies. Fund-raiser's evidence: 1. A charitable organization rarely gives its donors the right to vote on its policies. 2. The inability to directly influence how charities spend contributions makes potential donors feel less of an emotional connection to the charity. Per (2), the inability of a donor to influence a charity's policies diminishes the emotional connection to that charity. The fund-raiser argues that by empowering donors to influence policies, most charities could probably increase the amount of money they raise. For that conclusion to be valid, it has to be established that the result of greater influence—a stronger emotional connection—"can affect the amount of money that charity raises through donations." Choice E points to this assumption, so it is the correct answer.
Q: This boulder is volcanic in origin and yet the rest of the rock in this area is sedimentary. Since this area was covered by southward-moving glaciers during the last ice age, this boulder was probably deposited here, hundreds of miles from its geological birthplace, by a glacier. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the conclusion drawn in the argument above? a) Most boulders that have been moved by glaciers have not been moved more than 100 miles. b) The closest geological source of volcanic rock is 50 miles south of this boulder. c) The closest geological source of volcanic rock is 50 miles north of this boulder. d) There are no geological sources of volcanic rock north of this boulder. e) No other boulders of volcanic origin exist within 50 miles of this boulder.
A: E Explanation Psychologist's conclusion: Psychotherapists should never provide psychotherapy on talk shows. Psychologist's evidence: 1. Psychotherapists who attempt to provide psychotherapy on radio or television talk shows are expected to do so in ways that entertain a broad audience. 2. Satisfying this demand is nearly always incompatible with providing high-quality psychological help. In order to make the causal link between (2) and the conclusion, the argument assumes that psychotherapy should never be practiced if the psychological help it provides will not be of high quality. The answer will state a principle that affirms this assumption. Choice E: Since psychotherapists should never attempt therapy that is unlikely to be of high quality, we can properly conclude, per (2), that psychotherapists should never provide psychotherapy on talk shows. Choice E is correct.
Q: Rifka: We do not need to stop and ask for directions. We would not need to do that unless, of course, we were lost. Craig: The fact that we are lost is precisely why we need to stop. In the exchange above, the function of Craig's comment is to: a) contradict the conclusion of Rifka's argument without offering any reason to reject any of Rifka's implicit premises b) deny one of Rifka's implicit premises and thereby arrive at a different conclusion c) imply that Rifka's argument is invalid by accepting the truth of its premises while rejecting its conclusion d) provide a counterexample to Rifka's generalization e) affirm the truth of the stated premise of Rifka's argument while remaining noncommittal about its conclusion
A: B Explanation Conclusion: A person is not always morally blameworthy for feeling certain emotions. Evidence: 1. People are only responsible for what is under their control. 2. Whether someone feels an emotion is not always under his or her control. The author assumes that there is a connection between being morally blameworthy for something and being responsible for it. Choice B: (1) and (2) tell us that people are not always responsible for their emotions. Per the contrapositive of this choice, if a person is not responsible for something, then they are not morally blameworthy. Thus, we can properly conclude that people are not always blameworthy for their emotions. Choice B is correct.
LSAT Logic Reasoning Questions
1/16/2011
Q: Over-generalization
A: If you don't agree to sign the labor agreement, we'll fire you.
Q: Bad Sample
A: Using hairspray is causing a hole in the ozone layer.
Q: Fallacy of Composition
A: Beth must be an excellent chef. She graduated from Le Cordon Bleu.
Common LSAT FLAWS
1/9/2011
